Perhaps one of the biggest criticism of fraud organizations like Pathsaku Tai Academy, Moran Tai Research Institute
and so-called Tai Sahitya Sabha is their failure to understand even basics of Dai language. Not just they changed the
entire Dai grammar into Indo-Aryan style word-order (SVO) but they also convinced the government that tones are not
important and their fraud courses in collab with Dibrugarh University are in anyways even relevant to Tai learners.
Convincing the public of the fraud that Medini Mohan and his likes have been doing for the past decade (and more) has
always been a challenge as the followers of Pathsaku are nothing less than human zombies who instead of accepting
their incompetence (that they can't even speak a single word of Tai), starts heated arguments with deliberate ad-hominem, and other forms of personal attacks.
The purpose of this article is only to convince the actual learner and not cater to anyone else
The Tonal System
Ahom lost tones, so where did you get the tones from? This question I get asked a lot from students of Pathsaku Fraud Academy. But for the sake of the argument, tones are not something constant in Tai-Kadai languages. The tones that Ahom people employed in the beginning of Serkapha era were completely different from the tones they employed in late 18th or early 19th century for example. You can refer to “Tonal Change in the Tai languages of Northeast India” (Morey 2005) to read more about this
The tones that Ahom people employed in the beginning of Serkapha era were, by argument, completely different from the tones they employed in late 18th or early 19th century ~ “Tonal Change in the Tai languages of Northeast India” (Morey 2005)
I never use the word 'Traditional Ahom' which as we know is extinct for 200 years. If you want to
understand the difference between the Manuscript and Modern Revived Ahom, then you can refer to dis article
But for Modern Dai Ahom we use Mongnai Shan Tones as illustrated in the chart below
Manuscript Ahom Analysis
The need for tonal markers will only be there if you want everyone to understand what is written and you will be suprised to know
how recent most Tai script reforms are. Shan added tone marks after 1958 script
reform and Lao added them even later in 1975 under major Communist simplification
to make the language more phonetic and more systematic. And the Khamtis added
tone markings in their script as recent as 2003. Today most of these populations are almost 100%
literate and can read and write their script very well. If you support illiteracy and ambuiguity then you
will most probably belong in the so-called 'traditional' faction of 'no-tonal marks', but as is the purpose of this article
I will show you how stupid that position is.
Can you really ignore Tones?
Talk is cheap. Let's dive straight away to some examples
| Roman | Ahom | Meaning | |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Gài | kj! | n. chicken |
![]() |
Gái | kj# | n. penis (also xoi4 TODO) |
![]() |
Xài | xj! | n. egg |
![]() |
Xái | xj# | n. filth |
![]() |
Ga | ka | n. crow |
![]() |
Gá | ka# | n. car (also lôt) |
![]() |
Ma | ma | n. dog |
![]() |
Mâ | ma$ | n. horse |
![]() |
Pa | pa | n. fish |
![]() |
Pā | pa@ | n. aunt (respected term for aged women) |
![]() |
Phā | fa@ | n. cloth |
![]() |
Phâ | fa$ | n. sky |
![]() |
Ser | sEw | n. tiger |
![]() |
Sēr | sEw@ | n. shirt |
![]() |
Mi | mI | n. bear |
![]() |
Mí | mI# | v. have |
![]() |
Yùm | yumq! | v. smile |
![]() |
Yûm | yumq$ | v. smile |
![]() |
Ma Dam | ma dmq | n. black dog (used for sacrifice in ancient tai rituals) |
![]() |
Mâ Dam | ma$ dmq | n. black horse |
Don't forget vowel length!
It's not just about tones but also the length of the vowel, particularly the medial /aa/ vowel and the combining dipthongs formed with it, as illustrated in this meme
| Roman | Ahom | Meaning | |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Xao | xw | n. horn; p. they/them; pluralizer |
![]() |
Xaao | x,w | adj. white, pale |
![]() |
Xào | xw! | n. knee |
![]() |
Xàao | x,w! | n. news |
![]() |
Xāo | xw@ | n. rice; v. enter, come in |
![]() |
Xāao | x,w@ | n. fence bar |
![]() |
Xáo | xw# | v. shake, vibrate |
![]() |
Xáao | x,w# | n. time, period |
![]() |
Xâao | x,w$ | adj. middle-aged |
An important thing to note. Tai ears hear vowel length first and tone afterwards.
So if your tone is wrong but vowel length is right it can still be understandable.
But if your vowel length is wrong and tone is right it still sounds wrong and
ununderstandable ! So give special importance to stressing the vowel length.
So you can clearly see the confusion if someone says wrong tone, for example kún tái
they might still be understood (~Tai Person) but even if they say wrong tone but
correct vowel length like kún táai then they will not be understood at all…
Because these are inherently different vowels and Tai ears always listen vowel first tone later. Just to illustrate the same
| Roman | Ahom | Meaning | |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Kún Tái | kunq# tj# | n. tai person (also kón tái) |
![]() |
Kún Taai | kunq# t,j | n. dead person (also kón taai) |
![]() |
Yíng Xaao | yi[q# x,w | n. fair-skinned woman |
![]() |
Yíng Xâao | yi[q# x,w$ | n. middle-aged woman |
There is no room for 'context', tones are as quisessential to Dai as they are to Chinese. The trick is to completely stop using ur Indo-Aryan brain and start thinking how Dai speakers actually think - in tones
